For generations, Superman stood as the cultural blueprint for the ideal man. He embodied strength paired with restraint, courage guided by conscience, confidence anchored in humility. He was the man who could lift mountains yet chose gentleness, who could rule the world yet chose to serve it. Boys looked up to him not just for his powers, but for his virtues, a model of what a man could aspire to be at his best. But that man is no more.
The new Superman (2025) movie opens with a stunning reversal of everything he once represented. The first image we see is not steadiness or strength but helplessness: Superman, bloodied and defeated, sprawled face-down in the snow, crying out for help. His dog, Krypto, arrives, not as a loyal companion, but as a chaotic, disobedient force that bounces on his injured body, worsening his wounds, then drags him for miles across the frozen ground like a captive in an old Western. Our first encounter with this new Superman is not inspiration: it is humiliation. The next major scene continues the inversion. During an interview with Lois Lane, instead of the traditionally showcased Superman’s calm moral clarity, we see he becomes frustrated, raises his voice, and loses composure. Lois herself is combative and dismissive, questioning him about breaking laws even as he tries to save people’s lives. Their exchange is tense, unpleasant, and stripped of the dignity and mutual respect that used to define them.
This new portrayal is not random. It reflects a deeper cultural rewrite of what a “good man” is supposed to be today. Traditional masculinity - assertive, steady, principled, and protective - has increasingly been reframed as dangerous and toxic. Strength is treated with suspicion. Leadership is portrayed as aggression. Emotional steadiness is dismissed as repression. In this current worldview, a man is only considered virtuous when he is softened, humbled, or broken. And so Superman, the ultimate masculine archetype, must now be remade as weak, insecure, easily overwhelmed, and constantly challenged. The modern Superman does not inspire: he apologizes. He does not lead: he second-guesses. He does not project strength: he is allowed worth only after he first collapses.
When we change Superman, we reveal what we believe about men themselves. The sad truth is that the cultural ideal of the good man has shrunk. Instead of encouraging men to be strong and responsible with their strength, society increasingly expects them to be harmless, passive, and emotionally fragile. The result is a generation of young men who no longer see a clear path toward admirable masculinity: even their greatest hero has been stripped of his virtues.
In the end, none of this really seems to matter. The movie gives us bright colors, loud explosions, fast punches, and a few slow-motion hero shots. So the crowd cheers, the theater shakes, and everyone walks out smiling. Why do we care? We got our explosive action scenes, so we clap, and we’re happy.
Comments
Post a Comment